Skip to content
  • NVDA
  • AAPL
  • MSFT
  • AMD
  • TSLA

84-Year-Old Asks: Too Old for Roth Conversions?

A MarketWatch reader with $8 million in savings questions the value of Roth conversions at age 84, citing reluctance to pay a financial adviser 2% of assets.

By TMRO Staff·1 min read
84-Year-Old Asks: Too Old for Roth Conversions?
MarketWatch

Key points

  • Reader is 84, wife is 77, with $8 million saved.
  • Question: Are Roth conversions still appropriate at that age?
  • Reader reluctant to pay financial adviser 2% of assets (~$160k/year).
  • MarketWatch published the question on Aug. 29, 2026.

What happened

A MarketWatch reader, aged 84, posed a question about Roth conversions, noting that he and his 77-year-old wife have $8 million in savings. The reader asked whether they are too old for Roth conversions, and expressed reluctance to pay a financial adviser 2% of assets, which he calculated as roughly $160,000 per year.

The question was published by MarketWatch on August 29, 2026, as part of its personal finance advice column.

Why it matters

The question highlights a common dilemma for retirees with significant assets: whether the tax benefits of Roth conversions outweigh the costs, especially later in life. The reader's concern about adviser fees also underscores the importance of understanding the costs of financial advice.

Sources

TMRO Report writes original coverage based on the material listed above.